Liberal’s New Plan To Stop Global Warming: DIMMING THE SUN

It seems that there are people that just do not understand the world works and their desire to try and fix things in their minds would just end up making things exponentially worse.

Science fiction is something that we see more often than not in the world today. A good number of the things that were referenced in the science fiction works of old have come to be in existence. There are some things though that no matter the supposed ability you should probably not mess with though.

For example, there was a sci-fi movie that came out years ago where the sun itself was burning out and it needed refueling for lack of a better term. So a spaceship was sent with the technology to jump start the sun. That is a good idea, but DIMMING the sun is a really bad one.

Scientists have proposed a new method to fight global warming: sun-dimming aerosols released into earth’s atmosphere.

Research from scientists at Harvard and Yale universities was recently published in a journal called Environmental Research Letters which proposes using a technique called stratospheric aerosol injection to fight against climate change.

The proposed technique would see scientists launching sulfate particles into the Earth’s lower stratosphere at altitudes up 12 miles high.

Currently, the technology exists but there are no aircraft suitable to carry the particles and “developing a new, purpose-built tanker with substantial payload capabilities would neither be technologically difficult nor prohibitively expensive,” the researchers stated. The researchers have estimated that it would cost $3.5 billion to launch a system in 15 years time and would cost $2.25 billion a year to maintain over the course of those 15 years.

“We make no judgment about the desirability of SAI,” the report states. “We simply show that a hypothetical deployment program commencing 15 years hence, while both highly uncertain and ambitious, would indeed be technically possible from an engineering perspective. It would also be remarkably inexpensive.”

The report also acknowledges that cooperation between multiple countries around the world would be needed in order to make the project viable. The report also conceded that the technique is not without its downsides: it could negatively affect crop yields, lead to droughts or cause even more extreme weather. The proposal does not discuss the issue of greenhouse gases which are reportedly a leading cause in climate change.

The authors of the report themselves were quite skeptical, Philippe Thalmann of the École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, states: “From the point of view of climate economics, solar radiation management is still a much worse solution than greenhouse gas emissions: more costly and much more risky over the long run.”

Read More